<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Courts disagree over constitutionality of GPS searches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2010/11/courts-disagree-over-constitutionality-of-gps-searches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2010/11/courts-disagree-over-constitutionality-of-gps-searches/</link>
	<description>Smart Conversation about the Constitution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:04:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does GPS violate our right to privacy? &#124; Constitution Daily</title>
		<link>http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2010/11/courts-disagree-over-constitutionality-of-gps-searches/#comment-19800</link>
		<dc:creator>Does GPS violate our right to privacy? &#124; Constitution Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 16:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-dev.constitutioncenter.org/ncc/?p=1304#comment-19800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Recall that the Ninth Circuit and the D.C. Circuit courts handed down conflicting decisions were the police have attached GPS devices to a suspect’s car without a court-issued warrant. In the D.C. Circuit’s decision the original three-judge panel found that attaching a GPS device for nearly a month would exceed a reasonable person’s expectation of privacy. It therefore overturned the defendant’s conviction. Subsequently, the full D.C. Circuit court refused to reconsider that decision. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Recall that the Ninth Circuit and the D.C. Circuit courts handed down conflicting decisions were the police have attached GPS devices to a suspect’s car without a court-issued warrant. In the D.C. Circuit’s decision the original three-judge panel found that attaching a GPS device for nearly a month would exceed a reasonable person’s expectation of privacy. It therefore overturned the defendant’s conviction. Subsequently, the full D.C. Circuit court refused to reconsider that decision. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
