<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Striking the balance between liberty and security yesterday and today</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2011/11/striking-the-balance-between-liberty-and-security-yesterday-and-today/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2011/11/striking-the-balance-between-liberty-and-security-yesterday-and-today/</link>
	<description>Smart Conversation about the Constitution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:04:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alissa Feudo</title>
		<link>http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2011/11/striking-the-balance-between-liberty-and-security-yesterday-and-today/#comment-10626</link>
		<dc:creator>Alissa Feudo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 03:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-dev.constitutioncenter.org/?p=9191#comment-10626</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As stated, it is specifically during times of war that civil liberties are often restricted. Thus, it must be remembered that the said &quot;trumping of the Bill of Rights&quot; is merely a temporarily act of national security and liberties are returned to the people at the end of wartime. Additionally, with respect to the article &quot;At War with Civil Rights and Civil Liberties&quot;, we can observe that in such times the Bill of Rights is not disregarded, but in fact, expanded. Voting rights for African Americans and women were both granted during times of war. Therefore, I would argue that people exaggerate the severity of their loss of rights. During wartime, restriction is temporarily, necessary, and often results in even more rights for the people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As stated, it is specifically during times of war that civil liberties are often restricted. Thus, it must be remembered that the said &#8220;trumping of the Bill of Rights&#8221; is merely a temporarily act of national security and liberties are returned to the people at the end of wartime. Additionally, with respect to the article &#8220;At War with Civil Rights and Civil Liberties&#8221;, we can observe that in such times the Bill of Rights is not disregarded, but in fact, expanded. Voting rights for African Americans and women were both granted during times of war. Therefore, I would argue that people exaggerate the severity of their loss of rights. During wartime, restriction is temporarily, necessary, and often results in even more rights for the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alissa Feudo</title>
		<link>http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2011/11/striking-the-balance-between-liberty-and-security-yesterday-and-today/#comment-10635</link>
		<dc:creator>Alissa Feudo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 03:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-dev.constitutioncenter.org/?p=9191#comment-10635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As stated, it is specifically during times of war that civil liberties are often restricted. Thus, it must be remembered that the said &quot;trumping of the Bill of Rights&quot; is merely a temporarily act of national security and liberties are returned to the people at the end of wartime. Additionally, with respect to the article &quot;At War with Civil Rights and Civil Liberties&quot;, we can observe that in such times the Bill of Rights is not disregarded, but in fact, expanded. Voting rights for African Americans and women were both granted during times of war. Therefore, I would argue that people exaggerate the severity of their loss of rights. During wartime, restriction is temporarily, necessary, and often results in even more rights for the people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As stated, it is specifically during times of war that civil liberties are often restricted. Thus, it must be remembered that the said &#8220;trumping of the Bill of Rights&#8221; is merely a temporarily act of national security and liberties are returned to the people at the end of wartime. Additionally, with respect to the article &#8220;At War with Civil Rights and Civil Liberties&#8221;, we can observe that in such times the Bill of Rights is not disregarded, but in fact, expanded. Voting rights for African Americans and women were both granted during times of war. Therefore, I would argue that people exaggerate the severity of their loss of rights. During wartime, restriction is temporarily, necessary, and often results in even more rights for the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alissa Feudo</title>
		<link>http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2011/11/striking-the-balance-between-liberty-and-security-yesterday-and-today/#comment-10644</link>
		<dc:creator>Alissa Feudo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 03:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-dev.constitutioncenter.org/?p=9191#comment-10644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As stated, it is specifically during times of war that civil liberties are often restricted. Thus, it must be remembered that the said &quot;trumping of the Bill of Rights&quot; is merely a temporarily act of national security and liberties are returned to the people at the end of wartime. Additionally, with respect to the article &quot;At War with Civil Rights and Civil Liberties&quot;, we can observe that in such times the Bill of Rights is not disregarded, but in fact, expanded. Voting rights for African Americans and women were both granted during times of war. Therefore, I would argue that people exaggerate the severity of their loss of rights. During wartime, restriction is temporarily, necessary, and often results in even more rights for the people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As stated, it is specifically during times of war that civil liberties are often restricted. Thus, it must be remembered that the said &#8220;trumping of the Bill of Rights&#8221; is merely a temporarily act of national security and liberties are returned to the people at the end of wartime. Additionally, with respect to the article &#8220;At War with Civil Rights and Civil Liberties&#8221;, we can observe that in such times the Bill of Rights is not disregarded, but in fact, expanded. Voting rights for African Americans and women were both granted during times of war. Therefore, I would argue that people exaggerate the severity of their loss of rights. During wartime, restriction is temporarily, necessary, and often results in even more rights for the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alissa Feudo</title>
		<link>http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2011/11/striking-the-balance-between-liberty-and-security-yesterday-and-today/#comment-10653</link>
		<dc:creator>Alissa Feudo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 03:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-dev.constitutioncenter.org/?p=9191#comment-10653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As stated, it is specifically during times of war that civil liberties are often restricted. Thus, it must be remembered that the said &quot;trumping of the Bill of Rights&quot; is merely a temporarily act of national security and liberties are returned to the people at the end of wartime. Additionally, with respect to the article &quot;At War with Civil Rights and Civil Liberties&quot;, we can observe that in such times the Bill of Rights is not disregarded, but in fact, expanded. Voting rights for African Americans and women were both granted during times of war. Therefore, I would argue that people exaggerate the severity of their loss of rights. During wartime, restriction is temporarily, necessary, and often results in even more rights for the people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As stated, it is specifically during times of war that civil liberties are often restricted. Thus, it must be remembered that the said &#8220;trumping of the Bill of Rights&#8221; is merely a temporarily act of national security and liberties are returned to the people at the end of wartime. Additionally, with respect to the article &#8220;At War with Civil Rights and Civil Liberties&#8221;, we can observe that in such times the Bill of Rights is not disregarded, but in fact, expanded. Voting rights for African Americans and women were both granted during times of war. Therefore, I would argue that people exaggerate the severity of their loss of rights. During wartime, restriction is temporarily, necessary, and often results in even more rights for the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alissa Feudo</title>
		<link>http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2011/11/striking-the-balance-between-liberty-and-security-yesterday-and-today/#comment-10662</link>
		<dc:creator>Alissa Feudo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 03:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-dev.constitutioncenter.org/?p=9191#comment-10662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As stated, it is specifically during times of war that civil liberties are often restricted. Thus, it must be remembered that the said &quot;trumping of the Bill of Rights&quot; is merely a temporarily act of national security and liberties are returned to the people at the end of wartime. Additionally, with respect to the article &quot;At War with Civil Rights and Civil Liberties&quot;, we can observe that in such times the Bill of Rights is not disregarded, but in fact, expanded. Voting rights for African Americans and women were both granted during times of war. Therefore, I would argue that people exaggerate the severity of their loss of rights. During wartime, restriction is temporarily, necessary, and often results in even more rights for the people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As stated, it is specifically during times of war that civil liberties are often restricted. Thus, it must be remembered that the said &#8220;trumping of the Bill of Rights&#8221; is merely a temporarily act of national security and liberties are returned to the people at the end of wartime. Additionally, with respect to the article &#8220;At War with Civil Rights and Civil Liberties&#8221;, we can observe that in such times the Bill of Rights is not disregarded, but in fact, expanded. Voting rights for African Americans and women were both granted during times of war. Therefore, I would argue that people exaggerate the severity of their loss of rights. During wartime, restriction is temporarily, necessary, and often results in even more rights for the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alissa Feudo</title>
		<link>http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2011/11/striking-the-balance-between-liberty-and-security-yesterday-and-today/#comment-10671</link>
		<dc:creator>Alissa Feudo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 03:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-dev.constitutioncenter.org/?p=9191#comment-10671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As stated, it is specifically during times of war that civil liberties are often restricted. Thus, it must be remembered that the said &quot;trumping of the Bill of Rights&quot; is merely a temporarily act of national security and liberties are returned to the people at the end of wartime. Additionally, with respect to the article &quot;At War with Civil Rights and Civil Liberties&quot;, we can observe that in such times the Bill of Rights is not disregarded, but in fact, expanded. Voting rights for African Americans and women were both granted during times of war. Therefore, I would argue that people exaggerate the severity of their loss of rights. During wartime, restriction is temporarily, necessary, and often results in even more rights for the people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As stated, it is specifically during times of war that civil liberties are often restricted. Thus, it must be remembered that the said &#8220;trumping of the Bill of Rights&#8221; is merely a temporarily act of national security and liberties are returned to the people at the end of wartime. Additionally, with respect to the article &#8220;At War with Civil Rights and Civil Liberties&#8221;, we can observe that in such times the Bill of Rights is not disregarded, but in fact, expanded. Voting rights for African Americans and women were both granted during times of war. Therefore, I would argue that people exaggerate the severity of their loss of rights. During wartime, restriction is temporarily, necessary, and often results in even more rights for the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alissa Feudo</title>
		<link>http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2011/11/striking-the-balance-between-liberty-and-security-yesterday-and-today/#comment-19717</link>
		<dc:creator>Alissa Feudo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 03:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-dev.constitutioncenter.org/?p=9191#comment-19717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As stated, it is specifically during times of war that civil liberties are often restricted. Thus, it must be remembered that the said &quot;trumping of the Bill of Rights&quot; is merely a temporarily act of national security and liberties are returned to the people at the end of wartime. Additionally, with respect to the article &quot;At War with Civil Rights and Civil Liberties&quot;, we can observe that in such times the Bill of Rights is not disregarded, but in fact, expanded. Voting rights for African Americans and women were both granted during times of war. Therefore, I would argue that people exaggerate the severity of their loss of rights. During wartime, restriction is temporarily, necessary, and often results in even more rights for the people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As stated, it is specifically during times of war that civil liberties are often restricted. Thus, it must be remembered that the said &#8220;trumping of the Bill of Rights&#8221; is merely a temporarily act of national security and liberties are returned to the people at the end of wartime. Additionally, with respect to the article &#8220;At War with Civil Rights and Civil Liberties&#8221;, we can observe that in such times the Bill of Rights is not disregarded, but in fact, expanded. Voting rights for African Americans and women were both granted during times of war. Therefore, I would argue that people exaggerate the severity of their loss of rights. During wartime, restriction is temporarily, necessary, and often results in even more rights for the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alissa Feudo</title>
		<link>http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2011/11/striking-the-balance-between-liberty-and-security-yesterday-and-today/#comment-19712</link>
		<dc:creator>Alissa Feudo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 03:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-dev.constitutioncenter.org/?p=9191#comment-19712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As stated, it is specifically during times of war that civil liberties are often restricted. Thus, it must be remembered that the said &quot;trumping of the Bill of Rights&quot; is merely a temporarily act of national security and liberties are returned to the people at the end of wartime. Additionally, with respect to the article &quot;At War with Civil Rights and Civil Liberties&quot;, we can observe that in such times the Bill of Rights is not disregarded, but in fact, expanded. Voting rights for African Americans and women were both granted during times of war. Therefore, I would argue that people exaggerate the severity of their loss of rights. During wartime, restriction is temporarily, necessary, and often results in even more rights for the people.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As stated, it is specifically during times of war that civil liberties are often restricted. Thus, it must be remembered that the said &#8220;trumping of the Bill of Rights&#8221; is merely a temporarily act of national security and liberties are returned to the people at the end of wartime. Additionally, with respect to the article &#8220;At War with Civil Rights and Civil Liberties&#8221;, we can observe that in such times the Bill of Rights is not disregarded, but in fact, expanded. Voting rights for African Americans and women were both granted during times of war. Therefore, I would argue that people exaggerate the severity of their loss of rights. During wartime, restriction is temporarily, necessary, and often results in even more rights for the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crystal Strong</title>
		<link>http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2011/11/striking-the-balance-between-liberty-and-security-yesterday-and-today/#comment-10625</link>
		<dc:creator>Crystal Strong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-dev.constitutioncenter.org/?p=9191#comment-10625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I will admit to the fact that the Bill of Rights can be a constitutional shackle during times of war, it is one of the main documents that has made this country into the free democratic nation that it is today. The Bill of Rights stands almost as an extra checks and balance for our government when making decisions. I would argue that while the American people will fight to protect their nation, they will fight even harder to protect their civil liberties and rights.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I will admit to the fact that the Bill of Rights can be a constitutional shackle during times of war, it is one of the main documents that has made this country into the free democratic nation that it is today. The Bill of Rights stands almost as an extra checks and balance for our government when making decisions. I would argue that while the American people will fight to protect their nation, they will fight even harder to protect their civil liberties and rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crystal Strong</title>
		<link>http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2011/11/striking-the-balance-between-liberty-and-security-yesterday-and-today/#comment-10634</link>
		<dc:creator>Crystal Strong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 21:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-dev.constitutioncenter.org/?p=9191#comment-10634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While I will admit to the fact that the Bill of Rights can be a constitutional shackle during times of war, it is one of the main documents that has made this country into the free democratic nation that it is today. The Bill of Rights stands almost as an extra checks and balance for our government when making decisions. I would argue that while the American people will fight to protect their nation, they will fight even harder to protect their civil liberties and rights.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I will admit to the fact that the Bill of Rights can be a constitutional shackle during times of war, it is one of the main documents that has made this country into the free democratic nation that it is today. The Bill of Rights stands almost as an extra checks and balance for our government when making decisions. I would argue that while the American people will fight to protect their nation, they will fight even harder to protect their civil liberties and rights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
