<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Olmstead case was a watershed for Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2012/06/olmstead-case-was-a-watershed-for-supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2012/06/olmstead-case-was-a-watershed-for-supreme-court/</link>
	<description>Smart Conversation about the Constitution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:04:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What will the camera see? ::</title>
		<link>http://blog.constitutioncenter.org/2012/06/olmstead-case-was-a-watershed-for-supreme-court/#comment-20051</link>
		<dc:creator>What will the camera see? ::</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog-dev.constitutioncenter.org/?p=15329#comment-20051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] articles, Olmstead case was a watershed for Supreme Court by the National Constitution Center (NCC) staff at the Constitution Daily and Bill Scott’s The [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] articles, Olmstead case was a watershed for Supreme Court by the National Constitution Center (NCC) staff at the Constitution Daily and Bill Scott’s The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
