The Supreme Court has accepted two challenges to the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, on Tuesday that question the government’s ability to compel for-profit companies with religious convictions to pay for birth-control coverage.
Richard A. Arenberg says the Senate’s action to limit filibusters has opened the door to ever-greater majority power, and endangers the Senate’s historic role in protecting of the privileges of a minority party.
Bruce Ackerman from Yale Law says Congress, and not President Obama, should debate and decide the matter of extending the American military presence in Afghanistan.
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will debate, behind closed doors, if Americans should be forced to pay a sales tax on almost items they buy on the Internet.
Abigail Perkiss from Kean University looks at the practical consequences of the Supreme Court’s Voting Rights decision earlier this year, about a month after the first elections were held since the Shelby County decision was announced.
This table was provided by Lawrence O. Gostin, University Professor and Founding O’Neill Chair in Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center.
In a private conference on Tuesday, the nine Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court will consider four potential challenges to the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare. Experts believe at least one case will be accepted by the Court, to be argued and decided in its current term.
In the commentary, David W. Wise argues that the Senate filibuster, in all its forms, is unconstitutional.
Do corporations have the same religious rights as individuals under the First Amendment when it comes to the Affordable Care Act? Michael McConnell and David H. Gans discuss this far-reaching question with the National Constitution Center’s Jeffrey Rosen in this special audio podcast.
Attorney Scott D. Reich says people should commemorate the 50th anniversary of President John F. Kennedy’s death by celebrating the values he so eloquently advanced.