It will take five votes on the Supreme Court for Arizona to get permission to start enforcing key parts of its tough new immigration control law–S.B. 1070–and those votes appeared to be within reach on Wednesday.
In a continuing series of posts, David Thornburgh explores the tools and techniques public leaders use to get things done and move more than just a slim majority of a decision-making body to a conclusion. A few weeks ago, the New York Times Sunday Magazine published a blow-by-blow account of President Barack Obama and House […]
As voters in Pennsylvania, New York, Delaware, Rhode Island, and Connecticut go to the polls for today’s primaries, the National Constitution Center is premiering a full ticket of onsite and online programming to inspire citizens of all ages to understand and participate in the voting process.
If you plan to exercise your right to vote this Tuesday chances are you’ll be making special arrangements to avoid missing any work, school or other weekday obligations.
In the final round of hearings in a Supreme Court term that has seemed closely linked to the 2012 election campaign, the Supreme Court turns its attention this week to the emotional subject of immigration controls.
Between the extremes of a hands-off attitude and assigning blame for destroying courtroom decorum, trial judges have very wide discretion to decide how to run their courtrooms.
Our final Sunday Supper on March 25th was surprisingly our most productive out of the three, and it was a wonderful way to finish.
This year, technology and social media sites, most visibly Facebook and Twitter, continue to have a dramatic impact on the political world.
The First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech does not have an exception for federal judges, so the only restraint on what they say publicly–in court or outside–is their sense of ethical propriety.
On April 17, 1905, the Supreme Court decided Lochner vs. New York, which involved New York’s regulation of the number of hours a bakery employee could work. As framed by the court, the issue was what test was to be used in assessing legislation which restricted an individual’s right to enter into contract.