Tad DeHaven, a Cato Institute budget analyst and former Indiana state budget official, explains how the Washington shutdown battle could leave conservatives staring at a bigger government budget, despite their efforts to cut spending.
Jim Harper from the Cato Institute says the best way to determine if a search or seizure is constitutional is to just use the ordinary meanings of the words in the Fourth Amendment.
In this commentary, David H. Gans from the Constitutional Accountability Center argues that the debate over the religious rights of corporations is akin to the Citizens United case.
Lyle Denniston looks at the Library of Congress sharing a massive record of constitutional learning by its own experts to anyone with a mobile device or a computer – for free.
The National Constitution Center’s Jeffrey Rosen joined Carrie Cordero from Georgetown and Claire Finkelstein from Penn on Constitution Day 2013 to discuss all angles on the debate about drones, liberty, and security.
As we celebrate the 226th anniversary of the American Constitution this week, it is important not to forget that the document drafted in Philadelphia in the summer of 1787 is far different from the one that governs our country today.
A federal appeals court decision to grant protected free speech status to the Facebook “like” button contained another important element, involving a less-publicized constitutional amendment.
Margot E. Kaminski from Yale Law says it might make sense to allow states to figure out some difficult questions about drones and privacy before we revisit the idea of a federal drone privacy law.
If you missed some of the programing at the National Constitution Center on Constitution Day 2013, watch a video replay now.
Today’s Constitution-maker is the Internal Revenue Service. As of yesterday, the IRS began enforcing new rules that provide significant federal tax benefits to legally married same-sex couples, doing so to avert new constitutional problems.