It depends upon how, in a future case, the Supreme Court interprets the first decision on terrorism law to be issued following the September 11, 2001, attacks — Hamdi v. Rumsfeld.
The challengers to Kagan and Thomas argue that they have conflicts of interest that raise questions about their fitness to sit on the health care act cases.
The “People’s Rights Amendment” would end any constitutional recognition of corporations as “people.”
Individual Justices have said they don’t trust the technology not to be intrusive.
Nowhere in the Constitution is there a requirement that, to get anything controversial done in the Senate, the votes of 60 senators are necessary.