An eight-person Supreme Court tacked a major case on President Obama’s immigration policies on Monday, in part debating whether the state of Texas had the ability to sue over costs related to driver’s license for undocumented immigrants.
This morning, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case challenging President Obama’s 2014 executive action regarding immigration. Here is a breakdown of the basic arguments in the case.
Adam Liptak of The New York Times and Geoffrey Stone of the University of Chicago discuss the future of free speech in a special Freedom Day episode.
Lyle Denniston, the National Constitution Center’s constitutional literacy adviser, breaks down the initial responses requested by the Supreme Court in its current Obamacare case, which were submitted Tuesday night.
Lyle Denniston, the National Constitution Center’s constitutional literacy adviser, looks at a novel argument that President Obama can directly appoint a Supreme Court Justice if the Senate doesn’t act on a nomination.